All topicsSTATE OF AI REPORT.

AI rules move toward implementation

By October 2024, the policy debate was moving from proposals to implementation. The EU had passed its AI Act, the US was using executive authority to set frontier-model requirements, and governments were building institutions to evaluate increasingly capable systems.

Questions in this section

What was the EU AI Act’s status in the 2024 report?How was the US regulating frontier models?What did the UK AI Safety Institute do?

Europe passes a broad AI framework

The EU AI Act became law, with obligations scheduled to take effect in stages. The report emphasized that passage did not settle every implementation question: consultations and secondary legislation still left room to shape how the rules would work. This account describes the position in October 2024.

Europe passes a broad AI framework - 2024 report, slide 156
Europe passes a broad AI framework. 2024 report, slide 156 (PDF page 157)

The US relies on executive authority

The report described Executive Order 14110 as primarily directing federal agencies, while also introducing reporting requirements for very large model training runs. It stressed the fragility of this route: a later administration could revoke an executive order. The report’s discussion is a historical account, not a description of current US law.

The US relies on executive authority - 2024 report, slide 154
The US relies on executive authority. 2024 report, slide 154 (PDF page 155)

Governments build model-evaluation capacity

The UK’s AI Safety Institute succeeded the Frontier AI Taskforce, with counterparts emerging in other countries. Its work included evaluations, research, international coordination, and the Inspect evaluation framework. The report distinguished developing government expertise from having guaranteed access to every model that needed evaluation.

Governments build model-evaluation capacity - 2024 report, slide 178
Governments build model-evaluation capacity. 2024 report, slide 178 (PDF page 179)

Evidence you can use

AI policy in the 2024 report

Historical snapshot: October 2024. Dates and populations are specified per row.

AI policy in the 2024 report
MeasureReported valueDefinition and source
US training-compute thresholdMore than 10^26 FLOPsThreshold described by the report for frontier-model reporting under the 2023 executive order.2024 report, slide 154 (PDF page 155)
EU unacceptable-risk prohibitionFebruary 2025, scheduledImplementation date stated in the October 2024 report, retained as a historical schedule.2024 report, slide 156 (PDF page 157)
UK AISI functionsEvaluation, capacity, coordinationThree core functions described in the report, not three separate regulatory powers.2024 report, slide 178 (PDF page 179)

This is the legal and institutional picture recorded in October 2024. Scheduled dates and rules are preserved as historical evidence and should not be used as current compliance guidance.

Frequently asked questions

Sources and dates

Historical snapshot published October 10, 2024. This web edition was prepared on October 10, 2026 from the online deck and original launch posts. Findings and forecasts retain their original time frame.

  1. 2024 report, slide 154 (PDF page 155)Original 2024 report. Printed slide numbers are one lower than PDF page numbers because the cover is unnumbered.
  2. 2024 report, slide 156 (PDF page 157)Original 2024 report. Printed slide numbers are one lower than PDF page numbers because the cover is unnumbered.
  3. 2024 report, slide 178 (PDF page 179)Original 2024 report. Printed slide numbers are one lower than PDF page numbers because the cover is unnumbered.
  4. State of AI Report 2024: online slides
  5. Nathan Benaich: The State of AI Report 2024Air Street Press, October 10, 2024.
  6. Welcome to State of AI Report 2024Original website launch post, October 10, 2024.

Cite this page

Benaich, Nathan. “AI rules move toward implementation.” State of AI Report 2024. Historical report snapshot; web edition prepared 2026-10-10.