
How to read this finding
This is a historical account, not current legal guidance. Military examples should not be treated as proof that every stage of targeting or decision-making was autonomous.
It was a proposed risk-based law aimed at regulating AI uses, with different requirements according to the risks described in the proposal.

This is a historical account, not current legal guidance. Military examples should not be treated as proof that every stage of targeting or decision-making was autonomous.
Evidence you can use
Historical snapshot: October 2021. Dates and populations are specified per row.
| Measure | Reported value | Definition and source |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act proposal | April 2021 | Proposal timing; not the date of a final enacted law.2021 report, slide 166 (PDF page 166) |
| Risk groupings in the report | Prohibited, high-risk, low-risk | The report’s summary of the proposal, not a statement of current law.2021 report, slide 166 (PDF page 166) |
| Military example | AI-guided drone swarm | Deployment example reported in the 2021 deck.2021 report, slide 175 (PDF page 175) |
This is a historical account, not current legal guidance. Military examples should not be treated as proof that every stage of targeting or decision-making was autonomous.
Historical snapshot published October 12, 2021. This web edition was prepared on 2026-10-11 from the online deck and original launch posts. Findings and forecasts retain their original time frame.
Benaich, Nathan, and Ian Hogarth. “What was the EU AI Act in 2021?” State of AI Report 2021. Historical report snapshot; web edition prepared 2026-10-11.