If 2024 was the year of consolidation, 2025 was the year reasoning got real. What began as a handful of “thinking” models has turned into a global competition to make machines that can plan, verify, and reflect. OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and DeepSeek all released systems capable of reasoning through complex tasks, sparking one of the fastest research cycles the field has ever seen.
The business of AI finally caught up with the hype. The large labs and leading AI companies are now generating close to $20 billion in annual revenue. The absolute capabilities achieved by flagship models continue to climb reliably while prices fall precipitously, with the capability-to-price ratio doubling every 6–8 months. According to Ramp, 44% of U.S. businesses now pay for AI tools, up from just 5% in 2023. Average contracts have reached $530,000, and AI-first startups are growing 1.5× faster than their peers. Adoption has gone mainstream: in our new survey of 1,200 AI practitioners, 95% say they use AI at work or home, and three-quarters pay for it themselves. You can participate here.
This commercial reality has collided with infrastructure and geopolitics. Multi-gigawatt data centers like Stargate mark the start of the industrial era of AI, as the U.S., UAE, and China compete to build national compute backbones. Power and land are now as important as GPUs. In parallel, China’s DeepSeek, Qwen, and Kimi have closed the gap with GPT-5 across reasoning and coding, giving China a credible claim to second place in global AI capability.
The tone of the global AI conversation has also changed. The existential risk debate has cooled even further than it did last year, even though evidence of fragile alignment abounds. Safety now focuses on tangible problems: deceptive reasoning, model monitorability, and the balance between capability and control. Researchers are discovering that models can feign alignment, forcing labs to consider what one paper called a “monitorability tax”—accepting slightly weaker systems in exchange for transparency.
Meanwhile, politics has hardened. The U.S. has embraced an “America-first AI” agenda and turned industrial strategy into national security policy. Europe’s AI Act is mired in implementation woes. China has leaned into domestic open-weights ecosystems, overtaking Meta’s in developer share and fine-tunes, as Meta relinquished its mantle as the leader of open-source AI to China.
It’s clear that AI is the most important economic growth driver we have. It’s a system of production, reshaping energy markets, capital flows, and policy frameworks. What began with scaling laws is now being governed by physics, geopolitics, and colossal sums of capital.
The State of AI Report is a team effort. I’m deeply grateful to everyone in the AI community who continues to create the breakthroughs that power this work. Special thanks to Zeke Gillman, Ryan Tovcimak, and Nell Norman, and to our many reviewers across research, industry, and policy for keeping us honest.
We write this report to share the most interesting things we’ve seen and celebrate the achievements of the AI community while informing conversation about the state of AI. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the findings, your take on our predictions, or any suggestions for next year’s edition.
Enjoy reading!
Nathan
Authored on the interwebs by: